CREWS v. RESNICK et al, No. 2:2016cv00978 - Document 15 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 13) IS GRANTED AND THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION UNDER RULE 41(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 4/4/17. 4/4/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CREWS v. RESNICK et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL CREWS, : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL RESNICK, MAYOR NUTTER, and MAYOR KENNEY, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-978 ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2017, after considering the motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution filed by the defendants, Commissioner Michael Resnick, Mayor Nutter, and Mayor Kenney (Doc. No. 13); and for the reasons set forth in the separately-filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 2. The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
