GARLAND v. JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE et al, No. 2:2016cv00527 - Document 37 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS, ECF NOS. 23-24 ARE GRANTED. PLAINTIFF KENDALL GARLAND'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN THE EVENT THAT HIS PROBATION REVOCATION IS INVALIDATED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/31/17. 3/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GARLAND v. JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE et al Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ KENDALL GARLAND, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : JOSEPH J. PETERS INSTITUTE (JJPI); : CHAD MARGULIES; : AGENT DAGE GARDNER, : : Defendants. : __________________________________________ No. 2:16-cv-00527 ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants Joseph J. Peters Institute and Chad Margulies’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 23, and Defendant Agent Dage Gardner’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 24, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 23-24, are GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff Kendall Garland’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in the event that his probation revocation is invalidated; 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.__________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
