PEARSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, No. 2:2016cv00240 - Document 38 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 1/6/17. 1/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
PEARSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RODNEY PEARSON, Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MAYOR JIM KINNEY, Individually and in his capacity as Mayor, City of Philadelphia, Superintendent Douglas Giorla, Individually and in his capacity as Prison Commissioner, Philadelphia Prison System, WARDEN WILLIAM LAWTON, Individually and in his capacity as Warden, House of Correction, MAJOR EDWARD MIRANDA, Individually and in his capacity as Major, House of Correction, SERGEANT GANGEMI, Individually and in her capacity as Sergeant, House of Correction, CORIZON HEALTH CARE, INC., and QUAN BANG, RN, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-240 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the separately-filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 2. The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
