GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. DAHL, No. 2:2015cv03528 - Document 42 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 36 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/26/2017. 7/27/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. DAHL Doc. 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ OWEN DAHL, : Plaintiff, : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-4252 : GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY, : (TO BE DOCKETED IN 15-3528 PARTNERS, LLC, et al., : AND 15-4252) ______Defendants. _________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of July 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 36], and the response and reply thereto, and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED as to Count IV, Wrongful Termination in Violation of Washington Public Policy, and the claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The Motion is DENIED as to Count VII, Tortious Interference with Contract; Count VIII, Shareholder Oppression and Petition for Judicial Dissolution; and Count IX, Injunction for Inspection of Books and Records. 3. Defendants shall file an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 21 days of the entry of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe _____________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
