HOWARD v. PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al, No. 2:2015cv02843 - Document 36 (E.D. Pa. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 30 ), IS GRANTED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 9/19/2016. 9/20/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PATRICK HOWARD v. PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2843 ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s Response, it is HEREBY ORDRED that the Motion (Docket No. 30) is GRANTED in favor of Defendants and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT /s/Jacob P. Hart ___________________________________ JACOB P. HART UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.