BARCLAY v. WASHINGTON, No. 2:2014cv06257 - Document 32 (E.D. Pa. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC.NO. 18) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 10/15/15. 10/16/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BARCLAY v. WASHINGTON Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION VIRGIL BARCLAY v. NO. 14-6257 PHILLIP WASHINGTON, C/0, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, Superintendent, JOHN DOE, Captain, JOHN DOE, Lt., C/0 JOHN DOE 1, Sgt. JOHN DOE and C/0 JOHN DOE 2 FILED OCT J6 2015 fi. ICl.INZ, Clerk Dep. C!er!! ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of the Defendant Phillip Washington's Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Document No. 18) and the plaintiff's response, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of the plaintiff's state law cause of action in Count V, it is GRANTED; 2. Count V of the plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED; and 3. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
