FARBER et al v. TENNANT TRUCK LINES, INC. et al, No. 2:2014cv05028 - Document 28 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT TENNANT TRUCK LINES, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DOC. NO. 3 ), IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT SCOTT MCMEEN'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DOC. NO. 13 ) , IS GRANTED. ALL OTHER MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THIS ACTION IS TRANSFERRED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 2/9/2015. 2/9/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICOLAS S. FARBER ; JOY MEREDITH MAGEE; SUSAN FARBER; and JOHN LEWIS FARBER, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 14-5028 TENNANT TRUCK LINES, INC., and SCOTT A. McMEEN, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants Tennant Truck Lines Inc. and Scott McMeen’s FRCP 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, Motions to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) [ECF Nos. 3 and 13]; and the Plaintiff’s responses in opposition thereto [ECF Nos. 7, 10, and 16]; and for the reasons provided in the Court’s memorandum opinion of February 9, 2015 [ECF No. 27], IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendant Tennant Truck Lines Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [ECF No. 3] is GRANTED; (2) Defendant Scott McMeen’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED; (3) all other motions are DENIED AS MOOT; (4) this action is TRANSFERRED in its entirety to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois; and (5) the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. BY THE COURT: /S/ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. ______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.