IN RE: EDWARD F. SAGER, JR., No. 2:2014cv04310 - Document 12 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THE FINAL ORDER OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT ENTERED ON JUNE 6, 2014 IS REVERSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE BOTH THESE CASES FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 4/10/15. 4/13/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (REF. 14-4311)(ky, )

Download PDF
IN RE: EDWARD F. SAGER, JR. Doc. 12 I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT I FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE MATTER OF: ll I C.!A. NO. 14-4310 EDWARD F. SAGER, JR., BLkruptcy No. 13-14660- SR No, 13-361 I I c.l. GEORGE P. STASEN, et al. v. NO. 14-4311 BJkruptcy No. 13-14660 SR EDWARD F. SAGER, et al. Adfs No. 13-361 I ORDER AND NOW, this / I {Jfo;;:y of April, 2015, upon jeview of appellant George P. Stasen's brief [Doc. 3], appellant Edward F. Sager, Jr. 's brief[9oc. 4], appellee George P. Stasen's brief [Doc. 5] and appellant Edward F. Sager, Jr. 's brief [Doc. 6] all filed in Civ. I No. 14-4310 and appellee's brief [Doc.3] filed in Civ. No. 14-4311, and after hearing oral argument on February 10, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that: i 1. The final order of the Bankruptcy Court entered on 6, 2014 is REVERSED in part I and AFFIRMED in part. I I 2. The portion of the Order denying George P. Stasen's for a determination of non1 dischargeability as to the $1.05 million judgment entered in his Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County is REVERSED and on December 2, 2011 in the to the Bankruptcy I I Court for further proceedings as detailed in this Opinion. Dockets.Justia.com I 3. The portion of the Order granting George P. Stasen's rdquest for a determination of nondischargeability as to the $636,537.00 judgment entered in his 1 on April 12, 2013 in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County is AFFIRMED. I 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close both these cases for *atistical purposes. I BY THE COURT: i CHMjEHL,J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.