COMMONWEALTH'S MOTION TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL AGAINST OR DIRECTED TO DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, RESPONDENT et al v. HARRIS, No. 2:2013mc00062 - Document 48 (E.D. Pa. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO.44) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/2/2013. 10/3/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, )

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: COMMONWEALTH'S MOTION TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL AGAINST OR DIRECTED TO DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA MISCELLANEOUS ACTION NO.l3-62 v. FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of October 2013, upon consideration ofthe Commonwealth's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 44) and the response thereto (Doc. No. 46), it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion the Motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED BY THE COURT: C~.R~ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.