FISHMAN v. EPSTEIN et al, No. 2:2013cv05198 - Document 58 (E.D. Pa. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF ROBERT M. FISHMAN'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 52 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/7/2015. 5/7/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SPECTOR GADON & ROSEN, P.C., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2691 (LEAD CASE) v. ROBERT M. FISHMAN, Defendant. ROBERT M. FISHMAN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-5198 v. ALAN B. EPSTEIN and SPECTOR GADON & ROSEN, P.C., CONSOLIDATED CASES Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of May 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff Robert M. Fishman’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 52), and Defendants’ Response (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 53), it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. FOR THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
