FISHMAN v. EPSTEIN et al, No. 2:2013cv05198 - Document 51 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (C.A. NO. 13-5198, DOC. NO. 26 ), IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IN CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 13-5198 IS ENTERED ON THE CLAIMS SET FORTH IN THE COMPLAINT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ALAN B. EPSTEIN AND SPECTOR GADON & ROSEN, P.C. AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ROBERT M. FISHMAN. PLAINTIFF FISHMAN'S MOTION TO STAY (DOC. NO. 28 ), IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/30/2015. 3/31/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SPECTOR GADON & ROSEN, P.C., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2691 (LEAD CASE) v. ROBERT M. FISHMAN, Defendant. ROBERT M. FISHMAN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-5198 v. ALAN B. EPSTEIN and SPECTOR GADON & ROSEN, P.C., CONSOLIDATED CASES Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 26); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 35); Defendants’ Reply in Support of the Motion (ECF No. 135198, Doc. No. 39); the arguments of counsel at the hearings held on September 5, 2014 (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 42) and November 24, 2014 (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 49); Plaintiff’s Supplemental Memorandum of Law Sur Oral Argument Re: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 45); Defendants’ Post Hearing Memorandum in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 46); and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 13-5198, Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED. Judgment in consolidated Civil Action No. 13-5198 is entered on the claims set forth in the Complaint in favor of Defendants Alan B. Epstein and Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C. and against Plaintiff Robert M. Fishman. 2. Plaintiff Fishman’s Motion to Stay Pending Adjudication of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 28) is DENIED as moot. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.