MCCLARY v. BURNS et al, No. 2:2013cv04938 - Document 40 (E.D. Pa. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 5/27/16. 6/1/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MCCLARY v. BURNS et al Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARK MCCLARY, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-4938 JON D. FISHER, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, after review of the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, and for the additional reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum concerning Petitioner’s objections to the report and recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The report and recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. There is no basis on which to issue a certification of appealability. 4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
