DOE v. APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC., No. 2:2013cv04204 - Document 22 (E.D. Pa. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 18 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/10/15. 4/10/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PONSFORD P. DOE, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-4204 O R D E R AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2015, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: (1) Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claim of retaliation, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count III); (2) Defendant’s Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s claim of unlawful termination, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count II); and (3) Counts I1 and III of the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 3) are DISMISSED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 1 Plaintiff previously withdrew Count I, his hostile work environment claim. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
