LADYANSKY et al v. COOPER WHEELOCK, INC. et al, No. 2:2011cv00102 - Document 58 (E.D. Pa. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND (DOC. NO.49) IS DENIED; SIMPLEXGRINNELL'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT (DOC. MO.51) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 3/29/2012. 3/30/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LADYANSKY et al v. COOPER WHEELOCK, INC. et al Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN LADYANSKY and BARBARA LADYANSKY, Plaintiffs, v. COOPER WHEELOCK, INC. and SIMPLEX GRINNELL, LP, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No.: 11-cv-102 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint to Conform to the Evidence (Doc. No. 49), SimplexGrinnell’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint to Conform to the Evidence (Doc. No. 50), and Plaintiffs’ Rebuttal to SimplexGrinnell’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint to Conform to the Evidence (Doc. No. 53), as well as SimplexGrinnell’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. Nos. 51-52) and SimplexGrinnell’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. No. 54), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend is DENIED, and SimplexGrinnell’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lynne A. Sitarski LYNNE A. SITARSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
