PONTON v. UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS et al, No. 2:2010cv02213 - Document 5 (E.D. Pa. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK SHALL FILE THE COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE DAVIS (DOC. #2) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND THE CLERK SHALL SERVE THIS ORDER AND OPINION ON PLAINTIFF AND SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEROME B. SIMANDLE ON 3/22/2011. 3/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(tomg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
PONTON v. UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONNELL PONTON, Plaintiff, v. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : Civil No. 10-2213 (JBS) ORDER For the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith, IT IS on this 22nd day of March, 2011, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and the Clerk shall file the Complaint; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion [Docket Item 2] to disqualify Judge Davis is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and it is further ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order and the accompanying Opinion on Plaintiff by regular mail and shall close the file. s/ Jerome B. Simandle JEROME B. SIMANDLE, U.S.D.J. (By Designation, 28 U.S.C. § 292(b)) Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
