FUREY v. WOLFE et al, No. 2:2010cv01820 - Document 117 (E.D. Pa. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THIS CASE REMAINS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE HEY FOR FINAL DISPOSITION OF ALL PRETRIAL MATTERS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF A PARTY'S CLAIM OF DEFENSE. THE PARTIES SHALL CONTACT JUDGE HEY TO DISCUSS SCHEDULING THE REMAINDER OF THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 12/27/11. 12/27/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN FUREY v. TRAVIS WOLFE, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1820 ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 104) and the responses and replies thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today s date, that the defendants motion is DENIED. This case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Hey for final disposition of all pretrial matters not dispostive of a party s claim or defense. The parties shall contact Judge Hey to discussing scheduling the remainder of this matter. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mary A. McLaughlin MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.