SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al, No. 2:2007cv04647 - Document 340 (E.D. Pa. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THE STRAUSSER DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF TAX RETURNS OF MR. SEGAL AND THE TRUST IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 8/8/13. 8/8/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al Doc. 340 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : KENNETH SEGAL, et al : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-4647 Plaintiffs : : vs. : : STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC., et al : : Defendants : __________________________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2013, upon consideration of the remand Order of the Honorable James Knoll Gardner dated March 22, 2013 (Docket No. 329); upon consideration of Defendants Strausser Enterprises, Inc. s and Gary Strausser s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel Production of Tax Returns of Plaintiffs Ken Segal and the Karen and Kenneth Segal Descendants Trust filed April 9, 2013 (Docket No. 332); upon consideration of Plaintiffs Argument Brief in Opposition to the Discoverability of Plaintiffs Tax Returns filed April 9, 2013 (Docket No. 331); upon consideration of plaintiffs April 24, 2013 correspondence in response to questions posed by the undersigned during the April 11, 2013 hearing; after hearing held April 11, 2013, and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that the Strausser defendants motion to compel production of tax returns of Mr. Segal and the Trust is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry S. Perkin HENRY S. PERKIN United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
