RICHARDSON v. PIAZZA et al, No. 2:2007cv02065 - Document 34 (E.D. Pa. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN MAJOR PART AND NOT ADOPTED IN MINOR PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HAEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS NOT GRANTED; AND THE PETITION FOR REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 1/20/10. 1/21/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MELVIN KEITH RICHARDSON, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner, No. 07-2065 v. JOSEPH PIAZZA, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of petitioner s Amended Habeas Corpus Petition (Docket No. 15), respondents Answer (Docket No. 24), petitioner s Reply (Docket No. 25), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Docket No. 26), petitioner s Objections to Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 27), petitioner s Petition for Review and Reconsideration (Docket No. 30), and the record herein, and for the reasons provided in the accompanying opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN MAJOR PART and NOT ADOPTED IN MINOR PART, as set forth in the accompanying opinion; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 3. A Certificate of Appealability is NOT GRANTED; and 4. The Petition for Review and Reconsideration is DENIED. /s/Louis H. Pollak Pollak, J.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
