WILSON v. KING et al, No. 2:2006cv02608 - Document 93 (E.D. Pa. 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM/OPINION AND ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO.80) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 2/24/10.3/2/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(kk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WILSON v. KING et al Doc. 93 Case 2:06-cv-02608-PBT Document 91 Filed 02/24/10 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD K. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. LEON KING, ET AL., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-CV-2608 ORDER AND NOW, on this ____ day of February, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Answer to Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 80) and Defendants’ Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 84), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that the Motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ___________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
