Hall v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 6:2021cv00608 - Document 8 (D. Or. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court's Order and the time for filing has now passed. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 as moot and DISMISSES this case without prejudice. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed on 8/5/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 8/5/2022.) (ck)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hall v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION Civ. No. 6:21-cv-00608-AA KELLY SHAWN HALL, OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff; v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendants. ______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. In this action for review of a final decision regarding Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff, pro se, filed the Complaint on April 22, 2021. ECF No. 1. On May 18, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s Order and the time for filing has now passed. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel, ECF No. 3, as moot and DISMISSES this case without prejudice. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly. It is so ORDERED and DATED this 5th day of August 2022. /s/Ann Aiken ANN AIKEN United States District Judge Page 1 – OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
