Crampton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 6:2015cv01801 - Document 22 (D. Or. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and ADOPT the Findings & Recommendation 19 as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 3/22/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gw)

Download PDF
Crampton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DEBRA K. CRAMPTON, No. 6:15-cv-01801-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MOSMAN, J., On February 7, 2017, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) [19], recommending that I AFFIRM the Commissioner’s decision to deny Ms. Crampton’s application for Social Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-83f. No objections to the F&R were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 1 – OPINION AND ORDER the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman’s recommendation and ADOPT the F&R [19] as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017. /s/ Michael W. Mosman_________ MICHAEL W. MOSMAN Chief United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.