Kunkle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 6:2014cv01605 - Document 26 (D. Or. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 24 . Signed on 2/9/2017 by Chief Judge Michael W. Mosman. (jtj)

Download PDF
Kunkle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DIANA C. KUNKLE, No. 6:14-cv-01605-JE Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. MOSMAN, J., On December 13, 2016, Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued his Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) [24], recommending that the Commissioner’s decision be REVERSED and this case be REMANDED for an immediate award of benefits. No objections to the F&R were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 1 – OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks’s recommendation and ADOPT the F&R [24] as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 9th day of February, 2017. /s/ Michael W. Mosman_________ MICHAEL W. MOSMAN Chief United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.