Chaney v. Volunteers in Medicine et al, No. 6:2014cv01463 - Document 8 (D. Or. 2014)

Court Description: Opinion and Order: This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 3 is denied as moot. Signed on 11/3/2014 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

Download PDF
Chaney v. Volunteers in Medicine et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MARK A. CHANEY, Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 6:14-cv-01463-MC OPINION AND ORDER VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE, DELEESA MEASHINTUBBY, MICHAEL JAY, and CARMEN ADMIRE, Defendants. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff, pro se, filed a complaint against Volunteers In Medicine, DeLeesa Meashintubby, Michael Jay, and Carmen Admire on September 12, 2014. Compl. 1–5, ECF No. 1. On September 25, 2014, this Court issued an opinion dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Order 1–5, ECF No. 6. In consideration of plaintiff’s pro se status, this Court granted plaintiff until October 27, 2014 “to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified.” Id. at 5. Plaintiff has not taken additional action since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with this Court’s order, ECF No. 6, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3, is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 – OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com DATED this 3rd day of November, 2014. ___________________ _________ Michael J. McShane United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.