Webformix, Inc. v. Airspan Networks Inc., No. 6:2010cv06229 - Document 35 (D. Or. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER: Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction 4 . Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendations 26 is adopted in its entirety. Signed on 03/29/2011 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)

Download PDF
Webformix, Inc. v. Airspan Networks Inc. Doc. 35 FILED' 11 (lAP 2'3 11 ;OJijSDC·O~:E IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON WEBFORMIX, Civ. No. 10-6229-TC INC., Plaintiff, ORDER v. AIRSPAN NETWORKS INC., Defendant. Aiken, Chief Judge: Magistrate Judge Coffin issued his Findings and Recommendation in the above-captioned action on December 17, 2010. Magistrate Judge Coffin recommends that defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction be granted and the matter is now before me. cas~ dismissed. The See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b) . When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make -1- ORDER Dockets.Justia.com a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1); § Commodore Business Machines, 1981) . Plaintiff Recommendation. filed Upon Inc:, McDonnell Douglas Corp. 656 F.2d 1309, timely obj ections de novo review to of Findings and Recommendation, I find no error. establish sufficient contacts with purposefully directed at this forum, this 1313 the (9th Cir. Findings Magistrate v. and Coffin's Plaintiff fails to forum, or conduct to support the exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation ADOPTED in its entirety. Personal Jurisdiction (doc. 26) filed December 17, 2010 is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of (doc. 4) is GRANTED, and DISMISSED IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this ~ day of March, 2011. Ann Aiken United States District Judge -2- ORDER this case is

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.