Grant v. Oregon City School District No. 62, No. 3:2016cv02202 - Document 35 (D. Or. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER. Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 33 as my own opinion. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is GRANTED as against the Third, Fourth, and Seventh Claims, and otherwise DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 5/8/2018 by Chief Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pvh)

Download PDF
Grant v. Oregon City School District No. 62 Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION CHRISTINA GRANT, No. 3:16-cv-02202-YY Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. OREGON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 62, Defendant. MOSMAN,J., On April 18, 2018, Magistrate Judge Y oulee Yim You issued her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [33], recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [14] should be GRANTED as against the Third, Fourth, and Seventh Claims, and otherwise DENIED. No objections were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court 1 - OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [33] as my own opinion. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [14] is GRANTED as against the Third, Fourth, and Seventh Claims, and otherwise DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this afu day of May, 2018. 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.