Holland v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 3:2016cv02036 - Document 32 (D. Or. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 24 . This case is REVERSED AND REMANDED for an immediate award of benefits beginning December 22, 2014, and for further proceedings with respect to the period preceding that date. Signed on 2/6/2018 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

Download PDF
Holland v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION VICKI EILEEN HOLLAND, Case No. 3:16-cv-02036-JR OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. AIKEN, Judge: On December 4, 2017, Magistrate Judge Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F &R") (doc. 24), recommending this Court reverse and remand for an immediate payment of benefits as of plaintiff Vicki Holland's sixtieth birthday and for fmiher proceedings regarding the period of alleged disability preceding plaintiffs sixtieth bilihday. The F&R is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. I review de novo those portions of the F&R to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C); accord Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Holder v. Holder, 392 F.3d 1009, 1022 (9th Cir. 2004). Page 1 - OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com As identified in their objections to the F&R, the parties' dispute focuses on the meaning of the vocational expe1t' s ("VE") testimony regarding the vocational adjustments that would be necessary for plaintiff to transition to light work. I agree with Judge Russo that the VE unambiguously answered "no" when asked whether those adjustments would be "little, if any" under the Grid Rules. The VE's follow-up statement that the transition would be "minimal" does not create ambiguity on this point; reading the VE's statements together, it is clear that the VE meant that the vocational adjustments would not be substantial but nonetheless would exceed the minimal adjustments permitted under the Grid Rules. Having perfonned an independent review of the record, I agree that remand for an immediate award of benefits is the correct result with respect to the period after plaintiff turned sixty. I ADOPT Judge Russo's F&R (doc. 24). This case is REVERSED AND REMANDED for an immediate award of benefits beginning December 22, 2014, and for further proceedings with respect to the period preceding that date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated thisf--f'J:ry of February 2018. AnnAiken United States District Judge Page 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.