Blocker v. Bandmine.com et al, No. 3:2016cv01709 - Document 98 (D. Or. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER - I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 96 as my own opinion. The claims against the remaining defendants, Webnames and Bandmine, are dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution.IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of June, 2018, by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (peg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Blocker v. Bandmine.com et al Doc. 98 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION TYRONE BLOCKER, No. 3:16-cv-1709-AC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. BANDMINE.COM, et al., Defendants. MOSMAN,J., On May 14, 2018, Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued his Findings and Recommendation (F &R) [96], recommending that the claims against the remaining defendants, Webnames and Bandmine, should be dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution. No objections were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of 1 - OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [96] as my own opinion. The claims against the remaining defendants, Webnarnes and Bandmine, are dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this of June, 2018. Chief United States District Judge 2 - OPINION AND ORDER
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
