Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 3:2013cv02248 - Document 29 (D. Or. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 27 . Signed on 5/20/2015 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

Download PDF
Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MARK BROWN, . Plaintiff, v. Civ. No. 3:13-cv-02248-MC OPINION AND ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff Mark Brown filed this stipulated motion for attorney fees, ECF No. 27, in the amount of$4,262.29 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion, ECF No. 27, is GRANTED. Under the EAJA, this Court "shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses ... incurred by that party in any civil action ... unless [this Court] finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust." 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(l)(A); Meier v. Colvin, 727 F.3d 867, 870 (9th Cir. 2013 ). If attorney fees are appropriate, this Court must then determine whether the amount of fees requested is reasonable. See, e.g., Henslf!y v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983). Because defendant stipulates that plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees, this Court's inquiry is limited to the reasonableness of plaintiffs petition. Under the EAJA, an award of attorney fees 1 - OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com is limited to $125.00 per hour "unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorney for the proceeding involved, justifies a higher fee." 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (emphasis added); see also Thangaraja v. Gonzales, 428 F.3d 870, 876 (9th Cir. 2005) ("EAJA provides for an upward adjustment ... based on cost-of-living-expenses." (citations omitted)). The cost-of-living adjustment is determined by multiplying the base EAJA rate ($125.00) by the current Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and then dividing the product by the CPI-U in the month that the cap was imposed.Jd. at 877; Sorenson v. Mink, 239 F.3d 1140, 1148 (9th Cir. 2001). Pursuant to these cost-of-living calculations, 1 plaintiff is awarded fees at the hourly rates of$187.02 for 1.5 hours of work performed by counsel in 2013 and $190.06 for 20.95 hours of work performed by counsel in 2014. Accordingly, plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of$4,262.29. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 20th day of May, 2015. l______ \..._.._ ___ Michael J. McShane United States District Judge 1 Plaintiffs hourly rates are consistent with the "statutory maximum rates" under the EAJA. See Unites States Courts for the Ninth Circuit, Statutory Maximum Rates Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, http://www.ca9. uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000039 (last visited May 20, 20 15). 2 Payment of this award shall be paid to plaintiffs attorney Merrill Schneider upon verification that plaintiff has no debt that qualifies for offset against awarded fees. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589-90 (2010). If plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to plaintiffs attorney Merrill Schneider and mailed to Mr. Schneider at P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. If plaintiff has such debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made out to plaintiff and mailed to plaintiffs attorney at the address stated above. 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.