Edwards v. Otis Elevator Company, No. 3:2010cv01068 - Document 26 (D. Or. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 12 ; Denying Plaintiff's cross-motion for Partial Summary Judgment 19 . Signed on 5/25/11 by Judge Robert E. Jones. (dmd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LACEY EDWARDS, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant. Marybeth Wosko WELCH BRUNN & GREEN River Forum I 4380 S.W. Macadam Avenue, Suite 120 Portland, OR 97239 Attorney for Plaintiff Jodie B. Ayura Mark A. Hiefield HIEFIELD FOSTER & GLASCOCK LLP 6915 S.W. Macadam Avenue, Suite 300 POliland, OR 97219 Attorneys for Defendant ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 10-1068-JO OPINION AND ORDER JONES, Judge: The defendant's motion (#12) for summary judgment is denied. The plaintiffs cross-motion (#19) for partial summary judgment is denied. Simply put, there is a factual dispute on the issue of liability that must be resolved by a trier offact. -L DATED this ~ day of May, 2011. U.S. 2 - OPINION AND ORDER . trict Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.