Morton v. Thomas, No. 3:2009cv00053 - Document 16 (D. Or. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION & ORDER: On August 14, 2009, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak filed his Findings and Recommendation (doc. 14 ) that the court deny Petitioner Keith Allen Mortons pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 2), and enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice.The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Neither party timely filed objections. This relieves me of my obligation to review Magis trate Judge Papaks factual findings de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo., I find no error. Accord ingly, I ADOPT magistrate Judge Papakss Findings and Recommendation (doc. 14 ) as my own opinion. Mortons pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 2 ) is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed on September 4th, 2009 by Judge James A. Redden. (eo)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.