Toth v. INA Life Insurance Company of New York et al, No. 3:2008cv00653 - Document 40 (D. Or. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R 38 as my own opinion 19 , 28 . Signed on 7/13/09 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JULIE TOTH, No. CV 08-653-JE Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. INA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. MOSMAN, J., On June 18, 2009, Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (#38) in the above-captioned case recommending that I GRANT plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#19) and DENY defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (#28), and that judgment should be entered requiring defendants to restore plaintiff's long term disability payments, pay past due benefits with interest, and pay plaintiff's reasonable attorney fees. No objection to the F&R was filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as PAGE 1 - OPINION AND ORDER to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any of the magistrate judge's F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Jelderks's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R (#38) as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of July, 2009. /s/ Michael W. Mosman MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Court PAGE 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.