Monro v. Cain et al, No. 2:2020cv00866 - Document 17 (D. Or. 2021)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with and therefore ADOPT Judge Sullivans F. & R. 13 as my own opinion. I GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 7 . I DISMISS Plaintiffs Complaint 1 with leave to amend. The deadline to file an amended complaint is April 30, 2021. Signed on 4/8/2021 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dsg)

Download PDF
Monro v. Cain et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PENDLETON DIVISION SHAWN RICHARD MONRO, Plaintiff, No. 2:20-cv-00866-SU v. OPINION AND ORDER LISA CAIN; JEFF MOURA; JOE E CAPPS, Defendants. MOSMAN, J., On February 10, 2021, Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued her Findings and Recommendation (“F. & R.”) [ECF 13]. In her F. & R., Judge Sullivan recommends that I grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF 7]. Judge Sullivan further recommends that I dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF 1] with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed Objections [ECF 15], and Defendants filed a Response [ECF 16]. Upon review, I ADOPT Judge Judge Sullivan’s F. & R. as my own opinion. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 1 – OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F. & R. to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F. & R. depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F. & R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). CONCLUSION Upon review, I agree with and therefore ADOPT Judge Sullivan’s F. & R. [ECF 13] as my own opinion. I GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF 7]. I DISMISS Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF 1] with leave to amend. The deadline to file an amended complaint is April 30, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ____ 8 day of April, 2021. ~QJI{__ (YJ ~ ________________________ MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.