Peters v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, No. 2:2017cv00626 - Document 27 (D. Or. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Yous recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 22 in full. The Commissioners decision is AFFIRMED. Signed on 9/26/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)

Download PDF
Peters v. Commissioner Social Security Administration Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PENDLETON DIVISION TAMMY P.1, No. 2:17-cv-00626-YY Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MOSMAN, J., On August 14, 2018, Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [22], recommending that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed. Plaintiff objected [24] and the Commissioner responded [26]. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to 1 In the interest of privacy, this opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party or parties in this case. Where applicable, this opinion uses the same designation for a non-governmental party’s immediate family member(s). 1 – OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge You’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [22] in full. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 day of September, 2018. DATED this ____ /s/Michael W. Mosman _______________________ MICHAEL W. MOSMAN Chief United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.