Burnett v. Leatherwood et al, No. 5:2010cv00769 - Document 115 (W.D. Okla. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 112 , denying 102 plaintiff's motion for entry of final judgment as to Counts 1, 3, 4 and Certification for Appeal; and denying as moot 108 plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct discovery. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 1/31/2012. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Burnett v. Leatherwood et al Doc. 115 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT, Plaintiff, vs. KIM LEATHERWOOD, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CIV-10-769-M ORDER On January 11, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo issued a Report and Recommendation in this case. The Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment as to Counts 1, 3, 4 and Certification for Appeal [docket no. 102] be denied. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery [docket no. 108] be denied as moot. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by February 1, 2012. Plaintiff’s Objection to Report and Recommendation was filed on January 24, 2012. Having reviewed this matter de novo, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 11, 2012; (2) DENIES plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment as to Counts 1, 3, 4 and Certification for Appeal [docket no. 102]; and (3) DENIES plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery [docket no. 108] as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of January, 2012. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
