Tay v. Shores et al, No. 4:2019cv00602 - Document 4 (N.D. Okla. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Miscellaneous Deadline set for 11/22/2019); denying 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (lmc, Chambers)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Tay v. Shores et al Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA PAUL TAY, Plaintiff, v. R. TRENT SHORES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 19-CV-602-TCK-JFJ OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Supporting Affidavit. Doc. 3. Under N.D. Okla. Civ. R. 3.3(a) (“Local Rule 3.3(a)”), an applicant seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis must either submit a motion “on the form approved by this Court” or “furnish the Court with [ ] equivalent information.” Plaintiff did not use the Courtapproved form, nor does it furnish the Court with equivalent information. Plaintiff’s Application is therefore DENIED without prejudice. Pursuant to Local Rule 3.3(a), Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee or submit a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before November 22, 2019. otherwise, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2019. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
