Hellard v. Mid Century Insurance Company et al, No. 4:2019cv00043 - Document 53 (N.D. Okla. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy (Re: 52 Opinion and Order, Ruling on Motion to Compel ) (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hellard v. Mid Century Insurance Company et al Doc. 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DUSTIN HELLARD Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 19-CV-43-GKF-FHM MID CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a FARMERS INSURANCE Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER In compliance with the court’s order dated January 7, 2020, [Dkt. 52], Defendant submitted its privilege log and unredacted copies of the documents listed therein for in camera review. The court has conducted that review and finds that, except for references to reserves, all redactions are appropriate. The court finds that, although reserve amounts may not be admissible,1 the amounts are not properly withheld from discovery. Defendant is therefore required to produce the following pages with the reserve amounts disclosed: 219; 2358; 2362; 2371; 2374; 2378; 2392; 2404. SO ORDERED this 31st day of January, 2020. 1 Cases cited in the privilege log deal with admissibility of reserve amounts, not discovery of the amounts. Since admissibility is being discussed it is obvious that the reserve amounts were discovered. See Higgins v. State Auto Property & Cas. Ins. Co., 2012 WL 2571278 at *4 (N.D. Okla. July 2, 2012). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
