Capps, et al v Bullion Exchange, No. 4:2018cv00162 - Document 53 (N.D. Okla. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 40 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Capps, et al v Bullion Exchange Doc. 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ZACHARY W. CAPPS and ASPEN VALLEY HOLDINGS, LLC,, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 18-CV-162-GKF-FHM BULLION EXCHANGE, LLC and ERIC GOZENPUT, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Bullion Exchange, LLC’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses From Plaintiff Aspen Valley Holdings, LLC, [Dkt. 40] is before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for decision. A response brief has been filed, [Dkt. 47], and the time has passed for the filing of a reply brief and none has been filed. Plaintiff represents that Plaintiffs have produced documents to Defendants and that Aspen Valley has no further documents in its possession, custody, or control relevant to Defendants’ document requests. [Dkt. 47]. Relying on that representation, and the absence of any information disputing that representation, the undersigned finds the motion is moot and is therefore denied. Defendant Bullion Exchange, LLC’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses From Plaintiff Aspen Valley Holdings, LLC, [Dkt. 40] is DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2019. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
