McClellan v. Sharp, No. 4:2016cv00322 - Document 5 (N.D. Okla. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White :Transferring case to the Northern District of Oklahoma. (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Oklahoma Eastern on 6/1/2016.]
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McClellan v. Sharp Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DAVID MCCLELLAN, Petitioner, vs. TOMMY SHARP, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV-16-214-RAW-KEW OPINION AND ORDER Now before the court is Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It has come to the court’s attention that Petitioner was convicted in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the Northern District of Oklahoma. Therefore, in the furtherance of justice, this matter may be more properly addressed in that district. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred to the Northern District of Oklahoma for all further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of May, 2016. Dated this 31 st day of May, 2016. J4h4i0 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
