Matthews et al v. Bergdorf et al, No. 4:2015cv00676 - Document 111 (N.D. Okla. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; granting 107 Motion to Compel; granting 110 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Matthews et al v. Bergdorf et al Doc. 111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RACHEL MATTHEWS, an individual, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KILA BERGDORF, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15-CV-676-TCK-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, [Dkt. 107], and Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Order, [Dkt. 110], are before the court for decision. No response has been filed to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, [Dkt. 107], and the time to respond has passed. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, [Dkt. 107], and Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Order, [Dkt. 110], are GRANTED. Dockets.Justia.com Defendant Deidre Matthews is hereby ordered to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests by May 28, 2019. Defendant Deidre Matthews is advised that failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions including the entry of judgment against her.1 SO ORDERED this 21st day of May, 2019. 1 It is alleged in the motion that counsel for Defendant Deidre Matthews has not responded to communications from Plaintiff’s attorney. If this is true, continued failure to communicate may result in sanctions against counsel. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
