Conley et al v Columbia National Insurance Company, No. 4:2015cv00604 - Document 31 (N.D. Okla. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; granting 23 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Conley et al v Columbia National Insurance Company Doc. 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JIMMY L. CONLEY and LISA M. CONLEY, Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign for Profit Insurance Corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15-CV-604-JHP-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Production of Michael LeBlanc for Deposition, [Dkt. 23], is before the court for decision. Defendant has filed a response. [Dkt. 24]. No reply was filed. Plaintiffs seek the deposition of Mr. LeBlanc concerning his involvement in the claims decision which forms the basis of this case. Defendant objects to any deposition of Mr. LeBlanc contending he is a high ranking employee of the Defendant and had little involvement with the claim stating Mr. LeBlanc only authorized the payment of Plaintiffs’ claim on the recommendation of another employee. Because Mr. LeBlanc did have some personal involvement with the claim, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Production of Michael LeBlanc for Deposition, [Dkt. 23], is GRANTED. The court denies the request contained in the Defendant’s Response Brief to Dockets.Justia.com set limits on the scope of the deposition. However, if issues arise during the deposition, Defendant may utilize the procedure set out in LCvR 37.2(b). IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2016. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
