Lynch v. Malloy et al, No. 4:2015cv00364 - Document 49 (N.D. Okla. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; finding as moot 46 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s); granting 48 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lynch v. Malloy et al Doc. 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STEPHEN NICOLAS LYNCH, Appellant, v. KENNETH K. KLEIN, et al., Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15-CV-364-JED-FHM Adv. Case No. 14-AP-1059 OPINION AND ORDER Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief and Appendix, [Dkt. 46], and Appellant’s Amended Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief and Appendix, [Dkt. 48], are before the court for decision. The Appellees1 filed a response brief objecting to Appellant’s motion. [Dkt. 47]. Appellant’s Amended Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief and Appendix, [Dkt. 48], is GRANTED. Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief and Appendix, [Dkt. 46], is MOOT. An Amended Scheduling Order will be entered. SO ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2015. 1 All Appellees but C. Robert Burton object to Appellant’s request for extension of time to file Brief and Appendix. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
