Griffith v. Caney Valley Public Schools et al, No. 4:2015cv00273 - Document 25 (N.D. Okla. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy , setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): (No reply allowed) ( Responses due by 7/14/2015) (Re: 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ) (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Griffith v. Caney Valley Public Schools et al Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA HAYDEN GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.15-CV-273-GKF-FHM CANEY VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, [Dkt. 14], has been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendation. The motion was filed on May 18, 2015. No response brief opposing the motion has been filed. Pursuant to LCvR 7.2(f), if a dispositive motion is not opposed the Court may provide an additional fourteen days, after which the case will be dismissed, or the motion will be deemed confessed, as appropriate. In accordance with the foregoing rule, Plaintiff has until July 14, 2014 to file a response opposing the motion to dismiss. Failure to file a brief within that time will result in a recommendation to the district court judge that the motion to dismiss be granted. SO ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2015. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
