Malipurathu v. Howard et al, No. 4:2015cv00182 - Document 5 (N.D. Okla. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay, transferring case to the Northern District of Oklahoma. (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Oklahoma Eastern on 4/10/2015.]
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Malipurathu v. Howard et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DENNIS G. MALIPURATHU, Petitioner, v. BRUCE HOWARD, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV-15-089-FHS-KEW OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which the court construes as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A § 2241 petition attacks the execution of a sentence and must be filed in the district where the petitioner is confined. Haugh v. Booker, 210 F.3d 1147, 1149 (10th Cir. 2000); Bradshaw v. Story, 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir. 1996). Petitioner is incarcerated at Northeast Oklahoma Correctional Center in Vinita, Oklahoma, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the Northern District of Oklahoma. Therefore, this action must be transferred to that district. ACCORDINGLY, the Court Clerk is directed to transfer this matter in the interest of justice to the Northern District of Oklahoma. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2015. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
