Baldwin v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma et al, No. 4:2015cv00085 - Document 19 (N.D. Okla. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 14 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Baldwin v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA BELINDA BALDWIN, Plaintiff, v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, and JESSICA HAIGHT, in her individual capacity, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 15-CV-85-JED-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Rule 26(f) Conference, [Dkt. 14], is before the court for decision. Defendant has filed a response. [Dkt. 17]. No reply was filed. Defendant declined Plaintiff’s written request to participate in a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference because it had a Motion to Dismiss pending. Plaintiff then filed the Motion to Compel Rule 26(f) Conference, [Dkt. 14], but failed to comply with LCvR 37.1 by personally meeting and conferring with Defendant prior to filing the Motion to Compel. The court has now ruled on the motion to dismiss and Defendant has agreed to participate in the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference. Defendant was under no obligation to participate in a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference based upon Plaintiff’s request. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(1). Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Rule 26(f) Conference, [Dkt. 14], is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2016. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
