Hobbs v. Zhao et al, No. 4:2013cv00673 - Document 16 (N.D. Okla. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 10 Motion to Compel (tjc, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA BLAKE ROBERT HOBBS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.13-CV-673-CVE-FHM RUI ZHAO, doing business as R&M EXPRESS, and NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff s Motion to Compel, [Dkt. 10], is DENIED. Defendant s response to the Motion to Compel asserts that the motion is moot. The time has long passed for filing a reply and Plaintiff has not filed a reply brief challenging that assertion. The undersigned therefore concludes that the motion should be denied. SO ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2014.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
