Eaton et al v. JP&D Digital Satellite Systems, Inc., No. 4:2009cv00734 - Document 14 (N.D. Okla. 2010)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; remanding case (terminates case) ; granting 13 Motion to Remand (Documents Terminated: 9 MOTION to Dismiss Count Two of Plaintiffs' Petition ) (hbo, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RONALD SCOTT EATON, AMAL MARZOUQ, ) ) DARRYLL HOLLAND, DANIEL PRUETT, ) KENNETH KARIUKI, DAVID BRUNSON, ) BRANDON BURKHARDT, JAMES OWEN, DARYLE PENNINGTON, JAMES GAGNON, ) BOB ROGERS, SHAWN FLEMING, and ) ) KENNETH BIRD, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) JP&D DIGITAL SATELLITE SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-734-GKF-FHM OPINION & ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs Motion to Remand [Dkt. # 13]. Defendant s response was due February 16, 2010. No response has been filed. Local Civil Rule 7.2(e) provides that, in the court s discretion, any non-dispositive motion which is not opposed may be deemed confessed. Having reviewed the motion to remand, and it appearing to the court that plaintiffs are correct on the merits of their motion to remand ( [e]very separate and distinct claim must individually meet the amount in controversy. Watson v. Blankenship, 20 F.3d 383, 386 (10th Cir. 1994)), the court concludes that the Motion to Remand should be granted as confessed. 1 WHEREFORE, plaintiffs Motion to Remand [Dkt. # 13] is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March 2010. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
