Kinkead v. Durborow et al, No. 4:2008cv00562 - Document 109 (N.D. Okla. 2010)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 98 Motion for Protective Order; granting 99 Motion to Compel (jcm, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARK KINKEAD, PLAINTIFF, vs. TERRY DURBOROW, et al., DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 08-CV-562-JHP-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff s Motion for Protective Order or in the Alternative, Response to Defendant s Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. 98] and Defendants Terry Durborow and Jimmie Sooter s Motion to Compel [Dkt. 99] are before the Court for decision. The Court has also considered Plaintiff s Responses to Defendant Motion for Another Extension and Motion to Compel Document Production [Dkt. 104] as it relates to the Motion to Compel. The motions concern whether Defendants may obtain, at Defendants expense, copies of approximately 1,100 pages of documents which are responsive to Defendants discovery requests. After consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff allow the Correctional Center staff to copy the documents and provide the copies to Defendants at Defendants expense. Plaintiff s Motion for Protective Order or in the Alternative, Response to Defendant s Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. 98] is DENIED. Defendants Terry Durborow and Jimmie Sooter s Motion to Compel [Dkt. 99] is GRANTED. However, Defendants request for an award of attorney fees and costs is denied. SO ORDERED 24th this day of June, 2010.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
