-FHM Aircraft Fueling Systems, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines, Co., No. 4:2008cv00414 - Document 174 (N.D. Okla. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; granting 145 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (jcm, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA AIRCRAFT FUELING SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFF, vs. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO., DEFENDANT . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO . 08-CV-414-GKF-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff s Motion for In Camera Inspection of Documents, [Dkt. 145], is before the Court for decision. Defendant has filed a response, [Dkt. 158], and Plaintiff has filed a reply, [Dkt. 167]. Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendant to submit certain documents to the Court for in camera inspection to determine if the documents are properly withheld from production. Defendant responds that Plaintiff has not been diligent in seeking court review and that the documents are properly withheld. From the information provided, it appears that Plaintiff promptly disputed Defendant s withholding of the documents once Defendant provided a privilege log. It also appears that Plaintiff attempted to resolve the issues with Defendant before filing a motion with the Court. The Court, therefore, concludes that Plaintiff has been diligent in seeking relief. In light of the small number of documents at issue, it will not be a burden on the Court to review the documents in camera. Plaintiff s Motion for In Camera Inspection of Documents, [Dkt. 145], is therefore granted and Defendant shall promptly submit the documents to the Court for in camera review. SO ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2011. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
