-FHM Aircraft Fueling Systems, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines, Co., No. 4:2008cv00414 - Document 172 (N.D. Okla. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 139 Motion for Leave to File Document(s) (jcm, Dpty Clk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA AIRCRAFT FUELING SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFF, vs. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO., DEFENDANT . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO . 08-CV-414-GKF-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff s Motion for Leave to File Second Motion to Compel, [Dkt. 139], is before the Court for decision. Defendant has filed a response, [Dkt. 151], and Plaintiff has filed a reply, [Dkt. 162]. Plaintiff seeks permission to file a motion to compel which in turn would seek unredacted versions of memos that provide status updates for all of Defendant s fuel projects. Defendant responds, in part, that it has produced all portions of the memos relating to the projects at issue in this case. In reply, Plaintiff does not assert that the redacted information is relevant. Instead, Plaintiff simply argues that irrelevant information cannot be redacted under the rules. Discovery in this case is over. [Dkt. 138]. At this stage of the case, the Court will not entertain a motion to compel to litigate whether irrelevant information should be produced. Plaintiff s Motion for Leave to File Second Motion to Compel, [Dkt. 139], is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2011.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
