Robinson v. Crow, No. 6:2021cv00230 - Document 5 (E.D. Okla. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Ronald A. White, transferring case to the Northern District of Oklahoma. (case terminated) (acg, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Robinson v. Crow Doc. 5 6:21-cv-00230-RAW-KEW Document 5 Filed in ED/OK on 08/11/21 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DAMION M. ROBINSON, Petitioner, vs. SCOTT CROW, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV-21-230-RAW-KEW OPINION AND ORDER Now before the court is Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It has come to the court’s attention that Petitioner was convicted in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the Nortrhern District of Oklahoma. Therefore, in the furtherance of justice, this matter may be more properly addressed in that district. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred to the Northern District of Oklahoma for all further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of August, 2021. _________________________________ RONALD A. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
